Blogger Template by Blogcrowds

October 30, 2009

Reminder: A 15 Year-Old Girl Was Brutally Gang Raped While 20 Teenagers Watched

On Saturday night, a fifteen year old girl was brutally gang raped outside a homecoming dance she attended. According to media reports, more than two dozen students watched, photographed and filmed while as many as ten different people raped her. They were then overheard “reminiscing” about it. The girl was found lying unconscious under a bench.

Yesterday, three young men were arraigned in the case wearing bulletproof vests after police reportedly received threats on their lives. It’s important to note the outrage at the attackers is a delayed reaction. In reality, it took several days before the national media deemed this hideous event worthy of coverage at all. Four days after the attack, officials at the school where the rape occurred were still trying to put a positive spin on it, claiming the dance was otherwise a “successful event.”

Four weeks ago, Kate Harding lit up the Internet condemning the celebrity defense of Roman Polanski’s rape of a thirteen year old girl. It’s no coincidence that we are once again late to recognize the violent sexual assault of yet another teenage girl.

On Thursday, five days after the rape, the women of The View marveled that California law only mandates reporting of a sexual assault when the victim is under the age of fourteen. The Washington Post’s first mention of the assault was on Wednesday, when it speculated that the increase in violence against women on TV left the rape witnesses so desensitized that it didn’t occur to them to take any action. And almost all the media coverage of the gang rape has focused on the twenty or so bystanders who watched and even live-tweeted the brutalization of a fellow student.

When the rape was eventually reported by the mainstream media, victim-blaming was first on the agenda. The New York Times was one of the first outlets outside of California to mention the assault, noting in all subsequent reports, “the girl had consumed a large amount of alcohol by the time the assault began.” One almost expects for the next line to be a description of the “asking for it” outfit she must have been wearing.

Even the feminist media that led the outrage over Roman Polanski has neglected to report and investigate this story: Double XX (Slate’s women’s blog) has yet to mention it, Feministing recorded one line of outrage at the school official’s stupid commentary on Wednesday, and Salon’s Broadsheet logged 276 hand-wringing words on Tuesday, wondering, “When did high school students become so unafraid, so violent?”

What’s even more disconcerting to us as girls’ advocates is the muted response in the organized feminist community. None of the organizations that sent out press releases and appeared in the national media after Polanski’s arrest have noted the connection that we’re once talking about the rape of a young girl. As the public rallies to throw the book at the defendants in this one particular case, no one has mentioned that a rape occurs every two minutes in the United States and 44% of victims are under the age of eighteen. This assault seems like an opportunity lost to talk about an epidemic of violence against young women, and the crisis of school safety in our country, but perhaps it’s simply too inconveniently timed to coincide with the final push for health care reform – although it’s worth noting that some insurance companies consider sexual assault a pre-existing condition.

In a welcome exception to the widespread silence, Rosalind Wiseman argued the assault is an opportunity to talk with all teens about what it means to be an empowered bystander, and the high cost of staying silent in the face of degradation and cruelty.

It’s hard not to wonder how the conversation would be different if a 15 year old middle class girl was gang raped by black and Latino men outside a suburban homecoming dance. There is a growing media narrative about Richmond, and the high school where the attack occurred, as poor and notoriously violent. Is this because we want to believe that rape doesn’t happen to wealthy girls? Did it take so long for the media to report this assault because the survivor is from a working class community and comes from a school where perhaps we simply expect kids to “act like that?” Is it because we still live in a society that deems the life of a less privileged woman less important?

When Kanye West hijacked the microphone from Taylor Swift at the Video Music Awards, Twitter crashed with the force of bystanders outraged on her behalf. Facebook was awash in calls for Kanye’s head. We live in a culture in which oceans of humanity speak up for a celebrity who hardly needs attention or help, while a girl is brutalized behind a school by two dozen boys and barely a ripple is felt.

It’s not surprising, then, that the people who are speaking out on behalf of the girl are other girls. Friends of the victim stood up at a community meeting to protest the lack of security, both at the dance and at the school in general, claiming the young woman who was raped had felt unsafe before. Margarita Vargas, who was not at the dance but reported the assault after getting a text about it, placed the blame squarely on the perpetrators.”They think it’s cool,” she said. “They weren’t raised to respect girls.”

Judging from the muted public reaction to this horrifying assault, we’re starting to wonder if any of us were.

August 10, 2009

BREAKING: Phyllis Schlafly is...

Still alive! Who knew?

I know, that's mean. I hate when people say such things about the aging but still very relevant stars of the women's movement. But really: who of any generation has just been dying (DYING!) to know what Phyllis Schlafly thinks about health care reform?

A young conservative member of the Clare Luce Booth Policy Institute, evidently. At an event celebrating Schlafly's lifetime of service to the anti-woman cause, a curious young woman asked Miss Schlafly she thinks about Obama's plan to revamp health insurance. What followed was a bizzare, lie-filled rant based on the increasingly popular and deranged claims of the "deathers" - those who think Obama is trying to do-in the elderly by depriving them of health care. (Sarah Palin, whose anti-women views have earned her comparisons to Schlafly, is also a "deather.")

Like her young Alaskan protégé, Schlafly also has some sort of issue with community organizers. We, evidently, have never held a "real job." Ohhhhhh!! So that's why the pay is so lousy!!



The folks over at Media Action Matters have done a very necessary line-by-line truthiness analysis of Miss Schlafly's arguments.

Miss Schlafly and Miss Palin really should partner up to take this CRAZY on the road! Erratic paranoia, like ballroom dancing, is best done in pairs and I'm sure there are some townhall meetings at which they'd be a huge hit...

August 3, 2009

On Street Harrassment

This isn't for you, sir.
I didn't sweep this glitter on my eyes
And place this silver around my hips for your sorry ass.

My curves don't wiggle for your delight
And my curls for damn sure aren't shining in the sun for you, either
I am not Persephone - my person belongs to me in every season.

I am what you see because this is how I survive
My exterior is a manifestation of me as goddess
I wear it because I'm learning I alone can protect me.

Go on with your life.
I'm trying to go on with mine too.
Let's exist in the common humanity of that mission and that alone. Alrighty?

Right. Well, your whistling doesn't scare me.
I'll take it as a steady drum reminding me to keep marching in time.
You'll join us one day, for your sake. Until then, fuck you, sir.

August 1, 2009

Bat Shit Crazy (n.) - Randall Terry

On with the theme of anti-choicers off their rockers, Randall Terry has reared his ugly head again, this time premiering two bizarre and yes, racist, YouTube videos aimed President Obama.

As a reminder, Randall Terry is the original founder of the anti-abortion organization Operation Rescue. His tactics, for which he's racked up over 40 arrests, can best be described as...crazy. A 2004 Washington Post article described some of his early activities:

In 1988, Terry and his legions started standing in front of local abortion clinics, screaming and pleading with pregnant women to turn away. They tossed their bodies against car doors to keep abortion patients from getting out. They waved crucifixes and screamed "Mommy, Mommy" at the women. When Terry commanded, hundreds went jellyfish-limp and blockaded the "death clinics."

As of late, Terry's been riled up about Obama's health care plan. The first video is a protest, staged on 7/26/09, involving baby dolls being dragged and whipped in front of the White House.




The second video is so strange I won't even try to describe it. At some point, it ties Obama and Ruth Bader Ginsburg to the KKK. Nuff said.

Hey, Kansas City Star: Killing People Isn't Activism

Yesterday, the Kansas City Star published an article about a letter Scott Roeder, who stands accused of killing Dr. George Tiller, sent to the president of the anti-choice organization Operation Rescue, Troy Newman. The piece focused on the split in the "pro-life" movement caused by Tiller's murder and Roeder's continued indignation at being condemnded by those he feels should be hailing him a hero.

That Roeder is penning psychotic vitriol in his cell and sending it off via U.S. mail may or may not be news, although most people who stand accused of murder aren't offered a platform to so publicly gloat about their gruesome deeds. What's more disturbing is how the reporter breaks down the anti-choice factions, into "those that advocate violence against abortion providers" and those that don't.

Rev. Donald Spitz, who is identified as the leader of the Army of God, a group whose "web site supports violence against abortion providers," is quoted as feeling "more of a kindred spirit" with Roeder. He proudly served as the editor of the jailhouse letter, forwarding it along to Newman after reviewing it, on Roeder's request.

Wait. Since when is advocating physical harm to another human being , which is illegal, a valid political position? Since when is riling up others to do harm to other human beings not "inciting violence", another prosecutable offense?

I get fairness in journalism, two sides to every story, etc., etc. But what I fail to understand is how giving equal voice to the most extreme factions of any movement, especially those that advocate violence, is a mark of journalistic ethics. On the contrary, it lends credibility to "leaders" of movements who should be on police watch lists, not in the local paper. And it silences and disappears those whose messages are far more coherent - and valid.

The thing is, no matter how much I disagree with them on the right to abortion, the huge majority of those who consider themselves "pro-life" find Scott Roeder and Donald Spitz's tactics abhorrent. Many of these same people see Newman's Operation Rescue as radical and extreme. Most will never engage with anyone else about their views on abortion - to them, it's just a private, personal belief, not a point of political activism.

To characterize the anti-choice movement as split between those who advocate murder and those who do not is irresponsible, dangerous, and facutally inaccurate. It also accomplishes nothing at all.

An alternative conversation, appropriately called Common Ground, has popped up over at RH Reality Check to bring into the fold people whose voices are rarely heard in the hyped up "abortion debate" played out in the mainstream media. Far less dramatic and much more nuanced than the oft-quoted voices, it's worth checking out no matter which side you fall on.

Washington Post Wises Up, Pulls Offensive Video



Via TPM, the Washington Post has pulled yesterday's "Mouthpiece" video in which Dana Milbank suggested Secretary of State Clinton would drink "Mad Bitch" beer.

Says Kris Coratti, Director of Communications at the Post: "The video was a satirical piece that lampooned people of all stripes. There was a section of the video that went too far, so we have removed the piece from our website."

Right. Now don't do it again...an apology doesn't get you off scot free. We're watching you, Dana Milbank.

Fun Twitter activism associated with this story: feminists on Twitter tweet-bombed the two hosts, @milbank and @thefix, reminders that sexism isn't funny.

Feminists, however, ARE funny - @MyrnatheMinx started a #milbankbeer contest to come up with a perfect beer for the offensive funnyman. Top (real beer!) picks:

1. Seriously Bad Elf
2. Pastey White Boy Prohibition Style Ale
3. Blithering Idiot Barley Wine
4. Big Jerk Stout

And, fake twitter #milbankbeer fave: Pale Male Fail Ale!

July 31, 2009

"Mouthpiece" for Sexism - Hillary's "Mad Bitch" Beer

Classy. Charming. Come on, Dana Milbank, just...why?

This gets annoying long before the HRC slur - fast forward to 2:38.




Original, too...

Older Posts